tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18614557.post8811172396365765938..comments2024-03-20T07:22:58.096+00:00Comments on Relational psychiatry: Whistling in the windDBDoublehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16140020984190294123noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18614557.post-11512140272113817862011-05-29T12:06:40.166+01:002011-05-29T12:06:40.166+01:00The simple fact is that if psychiatry wants to be ...The simple fact is that if psychiatry wants to be respected the same as any other medical profession they need to practice the same as any other medical profession, and that involves getting fully informed consent BEORE treating them. Since psychiatry is a type of police force then this is simply not possible. <br /><br />It is also time they actually started to explain what the psychosocial aspects of the biopsychosocail model are, because the last I knew forcibly injecting someone was not psychological treatment or social treatment. <br /><br />Psychiatry is based on a bio bio bio model, that has NO evidence base. <br /><br />You only have to look at any criminal trail in which you have someone claiming they were mentally incapacitated, you have equally prominanent psychiatrists on each side and niether of them can agree on anything. Can you imagine a case in which two determatologists said that the person had no skin condition, two nuerologists who said there was no nuerological conditions, etc, etc. Sure doctors can differ on what they believe should be done, but the fact is psychaitrists never agree with each other, and they are still actively involved in their own form of Eugenics, even if they do not publically admit to it. <br /><br />Psychaitry will not and cannot change until they are willing to tell the truth which would be something along these lines: we have no idea of what causes a person to become psychotic and even less idea of how to treat it. We have some medications, that seem to provide some level of relief for a very small number of people, but they come with the most toxic and lethal of side effects, that are intolerable for 99% of people who take them. There has been some talk in the literature of some talk therapies, but no one is trained in them, no one can be bothered doing any research on them, and they take time and no one can be bothered even practicising them. We have no idea of who the people who may gain from medication are. <br /><br />Now that is the truth, yet I can't imagine a psychiatrist saying that anytime soon!!!! Instead they bring in laws to force people to take the drugs they are paid to prescribe, as they have no other way of convincing people to take them.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18614557.post-36580804000170369152011-05-24T12:42:41.431+01:002011-05-24T12:42:41.431+01:00Psychiatrists are complacent about their blood- st...Psychiatrists are complacent about their blood- stained history-their involvement in eugenics and the holocaust. In the 1960's, men such as Foucault and Szasz spoke out against the authoritarian character of psychiatry.IBRAHIMInoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18614557.post-1992120747351876882011-05-18T03:12:09.933+01:002011-05-18T03:12:09.933+01:00Shorter is short of neurons that underlie common s...Shorter is short of neurons that underlie common sense.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com