The chemical imbalance theory of depression has never been more than a hypothesis (see eg. previous post). The trouble with MHRA maintaining its position is that it gives credence to the idea that the hypothesis has been proven, which is clearly not the case. It seems willing to let people be misled about the nature of depression. Its bias in promoting antidepressants needs to be exposed.
Thursday, March 20, 2025
Drug regulator thinks it’s reasonable to mislead people about chemical imbalance in depression
In a reply to a letter from Peter Gøtzsche, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has made clear that it has no current plans to remove the references to chemical imbalance in the Patient Information Leaflets (PILs) of antidepressants (see reply). A previous reply to a freedom of information request has helped to clarify the history of the introduction of this term into such PILs.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Thanks a lot to DBDouble for sharing this. It's really ridiculous and annoying to see that the MHRA is sticking to their ridiculous claim of chemical imbalance. I'm glad though that this issue is getting the deserved attention and people can now see the true colors of the MHRA. It's a business model that's driven by profit, not actually wanting to heal people.
Post a Comment